Define the business research and its purpose essay - what is a thesis statement in a rhetorical analysis


 

Manage



 
 

Search

 
 
 

News

 

Comments

define the business research and its purpose essay

define the business research and its purpose essayDefine the business research and its purpose essay -If, however, a problem has complex ethical dimensions or otherwise ambiguous qualities, the average ability to think critically is often not adequate.Both can inspire people to increase their love of good questions.This seems to be contradicted by the quote from Vlastos and Graham.Many people's ability to think with some measure of critical quality serves them fine in solving some practical problems.Through the deconstruction of existing ideas, the classic style of the Socratic method frees people to think about basic principles and ideas with an enhanced sense of necessity and clarity.In the classic style, Socrates would ask the primary question of the dialogue in the form of “What is X? Apparently this Socratic questioning had quite an effect on the respondents.A new idea, once it was delivered through Socrates philosophical midwife practice of limiting himself to asking questions, was then examined to determine if the idea is a "false phantom or an instinct with life and truth" (Theaetetus).The Modern Socratic method is often constrained to a pre-designed set of questions that are known to generate a range of predictable answers and elicit knowable facts. Socrates would then ask more questions and the respondent’s answers would end up refuting the definition to the question "What is X? Once the respondent realized that the definition was not valid she would be asked again, “What is X? This process would often repeat until the end of the dialogue.The result of the Classic Socratic method is, by definition, a failure to find a satisfactory answer to the primary question in a conversation.Because it makes moral inquiry a common human enterprise, open to everyone.The Classic Socratic method uses creative questioning to dismantle and discard preexisting ideas and thereby allows the respondent to rethink the primary question under discussion (such as 'What is virtue? This deconstructive style of the Socratic method is ‘Socratic’ precisely to the extent that the weight of the actual deconstruction of a definition rests in the respondent’s own answers to more questions, which refute the respondent's previously stated answer to the primary question.The Socratic method of questioning is named after the Greek philosopher Socrates (469 BC–399 BC), who lived in Athens Greece.The full dynamics of how Socrates was able to handle the wide diversity of possible responses to his questions is lost to history.There are two phases in the Classic Socratic method.In the Socratic dialogues, Socrates only wants short answers that address very specific points and refuses to move on to more advanced or complicated topics until an adequate understanding of basic principles is achieved.The exact style and methodology of the Platonic Socrates changes significantly throughout the dialogues.This is because the need to think critically increases with the complexity and ambiguity of the issue or problem under discussion.Socrates and his method are most vividly seen in the early and middle dialogues.This inadequacy is especially evident when we are required to think critically about our own cherished beliefs and ideas.In the dialogues of Plato, the portrayal of Socrates and his method were diverse and ranged from the portrait of Socrates in the early dialogues to a richer diversity of conversational styles and ideas in latter dialogues.define the business research and its purpose essayBoth styles of the Socratic method are described below.There are many styles of question oriented dialogue that claim the name Socratic method.His father was Sophroniscus, a stone cutter, and his mother was Phaenarete, a midwife.This image of Socrates' conversations, with their typical failure to find an answer, is the most widely recognized portrait of Socrates and his method.I refer to the Classic Socratic method as a Two-Phase Freestyle form of dialectic.The ‘Socratic Effect’ provides the respondent with the opportunity to rethink justice, or whatever other quality or idea is in focus, after having their previously existing ideas discarded with their full agreement on the basis of their own answers to questions.The good news about the Socratic method is that some of its most powerful benefits are delivered to people in a way that does not require great philosophical prowess or teaching skill (Modern Socratic method).Socrates style of conversation involved his own denial of knowledge (Socratic irony).And if I may venture to make a jest upon you, you seem to me both in your appearance and in your power over others to be very like the flat torpedo fish, who torpifies (makes numb) those who come near him and touch him, as you have now torpified me, I think.In a later Platonic dialogue ‘The Laws’, there is still conversation but Socrates is replaced with ‘the stranger’ and his method is gone as well.The modern style is not deconstructive, but constructive.The Modern Socratic method can be used to good effect for leading a person to work out their own understanding of static knowledge such as mathematics.Although some commonly shared level of problem solving and evaluative ability, which sometimes passes for critical thinking is used in our daily lives, the full and rich depth of the human capacity to think critically is much greater than ordinarily realized.However, just asking a lot of questions does not automatically constitute a use of the Socratic method.Even in the dialogues of Plato, which are the most significant and detailed historical references to Socrates, there is not just one Socratic method.However, the most powerful aspect of the Socratic method (the classic style) is very difficult to employ.In Socratic dialogues, the primary focus is on the original thinking of the respondent as they try to answer Socrates' questions.The type of knowledge is not as important as the fact that, with the Modern Socratic method, the knowledge gained is specifically anticipated by the Socratic questioner.It is impossible to not notice that Plato had the benefit of being able to write the answers as well as the questions.The more difficult, ambiguous or controversial the issue, the more powerful the usefulness of the Classic Socratic method will be in our conversations. define the business research and its purpose essay The purpose of this style of questioning in law school is to prepare students for the extremely rough environment of courtroom litigation.Meno believed that he understood the nature of virtue. Plato gives us a description of the effect this questioning had on Meno when Meno tells Socrates, “O Socrates, I used to be told, before I knew you, that you were always doubting yourself and making others doubt; and now you are casting your spells over me, and I am simply getting bewitched and enchanted, and am at my wits' end.In these dialogues, Socrates claims to have no knowledge of even the most fundamental principles, such as justice, holiness, friendship or virtue.Even though the law school form has the flavor of the deconstructive nature of the Classic Socratic Method (see "The Deconstructive Phase" below), the actual structure of Socratic Dialogue and the nurturing gentleness, which was characteristic of Socrates and his method, are absent.Obtaining an enhanced freedom to think through discarding preexisting bad ideas is the penultimate goal of the classic style of the Socratic method.In these conversations, Socrates became the student and made those he questioned the teacher.This is the most widely used style today because it is the easiest to employ.The Modern Socratic method has historical precedent in the dialogues of Plato.Furthermore, Socrates tells Meno that he never knew anyone else who had an understanding of virtue.The Classic Socratic method is freestyle because, due to the nature of the questions, it cannot predict the responses to questions, anticipate the flow of the conversation or even know if a satisfactory answer is possible. With each new definition the respondent is subjected to more questions and continues to fail to define X.This works by exposing unknown or unacknowledged ambiguity and complexity, which makes the respondent realize she has more thinking to do.The Socratic method is one of the most famous, least used, and least understood teaching and conversation practices.Although there is nothing genuinely Socratic about the violently contentious law school version of the method, the fact that a law student’s exposure to this very intense type of questioning will often break her down and force her to dig deep and perform better does have something of the flavor of the Classic Socratic Method.If a satisfactory answer is found, this represents a transition to the ‘Modern Socratic method.’ The ultimate goal of the Socratic method is to increase understanding through inquiry.Vlastos and Graham offer an important insight into the value of the Socratic method: "Why rank that method among the great achievements of humanity?The purpose of the first phase of the Classic Socratic method is that it prepares people to think.The search for a definition focused on the true nature of the subject under question and not just on how the word is used correctly in a sentence.This diversity in the dialogues was so great that Plato even decided to drop both Socrates and his method in some of his writing.The Classic Socratic method is a profoundly useful tool to facilitate improvements in critical thinking and to elevate the quality of human discourse regarding difficult and controversial issues.The law school form of their so called "Socratic method" is not what will be discussed in my writings, nor is it appropriate in most educational contexts. define the business research and its purpose essay With Meno’s words above we see the effect of the Classic Socratic method. Either a person will be inspired to better and more vigorous thinking about a question or they will get discouraged by having their perspective challenged.The high level of difficulty in using the Classic Socratic method explains why this style is almost never used.Meno was shocked and could scarcely believe it when Socrates tells him that he not only does not know if virtue can be taught, but does not understand the nature of virtue.For my soul and my tongue are really torpid, and I do not know how to answer you; and though I have been delivered of an infinite variety of speeches about virtue before now, and to many persons-and very good ones they were, as I thought. And I think that you are very wise in not voyaging and going away from home, for if you did in other places as do in Athens, you would be cast into prison as a magician.” - from Meno Meno had been moved from a sense of security over his knowledge about virtue to the uncomfortable realization that he cannot even define virtue.This failure produces a realization of ignorance in the respondent (Socratic Effect) which can, it is hoped, inspire the respondent to dig deep and think about the question with a new freedom that is obtained from discarding a previously held belief.It is much easier to lead a person, by baby steps, to specific knowledge through a series of questions than it is to force a person to abandon a cherished idea and rethink an important or controversial issue just by asking creative questions.In spite of their differences, both styles of the Socratic method have some common aspects.This knowledge can be specific data, training in approaches to problem solving, or leading one to embrace a specific belief.” In this case, the Classic Socratic method functions to tear down existing ideas of justice.It is the purpose of the research on this website to make the powerful truth of the Vlastos and Graham quote a commonly accessible, living reality for anyone wanting to actually use the Socratic method.This difficulty of usage gave rise to the popularity of what I call the ‘Modern Socratic method.’ The Modern Socratic method is a process of questioning used to successfully lead a person to knowledge through small steps.The subjects of Socrates' conversations often revolved around defining ideas such as, justice, virtue, beauty, courage, temperance, and friendship.The Socratic method, with its focus on a person's original and critical thinking in the context of life's important questions, is foundational to human moral development.This means that the conversation is often stuck in the attempt to answer what appears to be an unanswerable basic question.The brilliance of the Socratic method is in the character developing power it has through the exercise of a person's love of asking and answering questions in the pursuit of knowledge.A contemporary example of the Classic Socratic method is the dialogue, The Moral Bankruptcy of Faith, where the Classic Socratic method is used to demonstrate the necessity of caution when making overly broad statements about morality.This stands in contrast to the Classic Socratic method in which the actual outcomes are unknown by all parties.Meno’s reluctance to believe Socrates never knew anyone who understood what virtue is was based on his belief that any grown and properly educated man would have some knowledge of virtue.In the Socratic dialogue called Meno, Socrates is asked by Meno if he believes that virtue can be taught.In this style of the Socratic method, for example, there is no point in getting deeply into complicated theories of particular applications of justice in society until one can answer a much simpler question like, “What is justice? define the business research and its purpose essay This seems to be contradicted by the quote from Vlastos and Graham. define the business research and its purpose essay




Status: FreeWare
OS: Windows|Mac OS
Autors 3317
Update: 26-Nov-2017 18:05
Cat: Home »